Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 Okla. 714 - Honnold v. Saunders

Honnold v. Saunders’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1926
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the provisions of said section the bonds so issued could not lawfully ¡exceed the actual amount of the -outstanding indebtedness of the township, and if, by reason of any understanding or agreement between the plaintiff in error and the township officers, ten per cent., the amount of the fee and expenses claimed by the plaintiff in error, was added to the .amount thereof, the same was done in violation of the statute, and constituted a fraud upon the township, and plaintiff cannot profit thereby.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.