Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 OR 281 - Hoover v. King

Hoover v. King’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
November 1975
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 1975

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 21 state decisions

11019031910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dawley v. . Brown · Moores v. Moores · Oney v. Clendenin · King v. . Townshend · Hughes v. Wheeler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is thus apparent that the statute contemplates that the title to land may be tried in an action to recover possession thereof, and that, so far as the same is tried and determined, the judgment therein is conclusive upon the party against whom it is given.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““That only is deemed to have been determined by a former judgment, decree, or order which appears upon its face to have been so determined, or which was actually and necessarily included therein or necessary thereto.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.