State v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2024
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hurtado v. People of the State of California · Roberts v. Florida · Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina · 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · 125 Wash. 2d 533 - Marley v. Department of Labor & Industries
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“approved by the court, accepted by Petitioner at arraignment, and used by the trial court in presenting the case to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Eaton“at any time before verdict or finding if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Eaton“Marley v. Dep't of Labor & Indus., 125 Wash.2d 533, 539 , 886 P.2d 189 (1994).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.