Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 PACOMMW 143 - Green v. Commonwealth

Green v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2002

8 state decisions

401979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Hartlieb · Temple v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways · Scott v. C. E. Powell Coal Co. · Bair v. Susquehanna Collieries Co. · 184 Pa. Super. 603 - Ede v. Ruhe Motor Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The compensation contemplated by this article may at any time be commuted by the board, at its then value when discounted at five per centum interest, with annual rests, upon application of either party, with due notice to the other, if it appear that such commutation will be for the best interest of the employe or the dependents of the deceased employe, and that it will avoid undue expense or undue hardship to either party....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Finally, we note that had Green and Roadway intended a commutation of benefits rather than a settlement, no release would have been necessary because once a commuted amount is paid the relationship between employer and employee is settled and all obligations are satisfied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.