43 So. 3d 235 - Burge v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 779 So. 2d 704 - Naquin v. Titan Indem. Co. · 907 So. 2d 723 - Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel · 851 So. 2d 319 - Johnson v. Brown · Johnson v. UNIV. MEDICAL CTR. IN LAFAYETTE · 734 So. 2d 1263 - Chinn v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. An applicant is entitled to compensation ... if he has served in whole or in part a sentence of imprisonment under the laws of this state for a crime for which he was convicted and: (1) The conviction of the applicant has been reversed or vacated; and (2) The applicant has proven by clear and convincing scientific or |4non-scienti-fic evidence that he is factually innocent of the crime for which he was convicted. [[Image here]] C. (1) All applications for compensation ... shall be filed in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court ... and shall be allotted to the civil division as provided by Code of Civil Procedure article 253.1 and applicable rules of court. The court shall render a final decision on all applications for compensation filed in accordance with the provisions of this Section and shall be tried by the judge alone.... The court shall submit a copy of any application filed ... to the sentencing court and the district attorney within fifteen days of receiving such application.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.