43 So. 3d 461 - Means v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 872 So. 2d 711 - Williams v. State · 731 So. 2d 1120 - Young v. State · Johnson v. State · United States v. Abushaar · 437 So. 2d 1218 - Cobb v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“IT IS FURTHER ADJUDICATED AND THE COURT SO FINDS that the banishment provision herein bears a reasonable relationship to the purposes of the suspended sentence or probation, that the ends of justice and the best interest of the public and the Defendant will be served by such banishment during the period of the suspended sentence, that the banishment provision of the suspended sentence does not violate the public policy of the State of Mississippi, that the banishment provision of the suspended sentence herein does not defeat the rehabilitative purpose of the probation and/or suspended sentence, and such provision does not violate the Defendant’s rights under the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Means v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.