Clark v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 847 So. 2d 843 - Lauro v. Lauro · 609 So. 2d 426 - Rawson v. Buta · 644 So. 2d 269 - Powell v. Powell · 650 So. 2d 469 - Michael v. Michael · 759 So. 2d 1250 - Sanghi v. Sanghi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ll property division, lump[-]sum or periodic alimony payment, and mutual obligations for child support should be considered together. Alimony and equitable distribution are distinct concepts, but together they command the entire field of financial settlement of divorce. Therefore, where one expands, the other must recede.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[I]n Rule 81 matters, a Rule 81 summons must be issued; otherwise, service is defective. Actual notice does not cure defective process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Id. (citing Sanghi v. Sanghi , 759 So.2d 1250 , 1256 (¶ 30) (Miss. Ct. App. 2000) ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.