Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

43 So. 3d 673

43 So.3d 673

35 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 467

Roberts v. Brown

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 31, 2010

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 2010-08-31

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2018

12 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-08-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

QUINCE, J.,

¶1concurring.

¶2I concur in the majority opinion because the only issues that can be raised that will result in the striking of either one or both proposed amendments from the ballot are whether the proposals violates the single subject requirement and whether the ballot title and summary are misleading. Those issues have already been addressed by this Court, resulting in the placement of these two proposals on the ballot. The other issues raised by the parties are premature and cannot serve as a basis to remove the proposals from the ballot. The wisdom and feasibility of a proposal are not matters that a court, even initially, can take into consideration in determining whether a measure should be on the ballot. These issues may well be the subject of litigation if the proposals are voted on favorably by the elector.

/43/so3d/673 · .json · Public domain