Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 SO3D 7 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Purkett v. Elem · Reading Co. v. Schweitzer · Komen v. Robbins · Neshewat v. Hagstrom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““where, as in the present case, the trial court does not make an express finding that a prima facie case of discrimination has been established but nonetheless requires the challenged party to explain its peremptory strikes, the appellate court will presume that the trial court found a prima facie case and will evaluate the explanations offered by the challenged party.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.