Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 SW3D 336 - State v. Hunter

State v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Blankenship · State v. Rousan · State v. Hornbuckle · State v. Middleton · State v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) the opportunity of the witness to view the subject; 2) the witness’s degree of attention; 3) the accuracy of any prior description given by the witness; 4) the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness in making the identification; and 5) the interval between the event and the identification procedure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In reviewing the trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress, the facts and any reasonable inferences arising therefrom are to be viewed in a light most favorable to the ruling of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The trial court's ruling is clearly erroneous if we are left with a definite and firm belief a mistake has been made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.