Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

43 S.W.3d 901

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 2001

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2001-05-09

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2003

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-05-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant Yusaf Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/43/sw3d/901 · .json · Public domain