Ryan v. Commissioner

¶1MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

¶2DRENNEN, Judge: This case was assigned to and heard by Special Trial Judge Daniel J. Dinan pursuant to the provisions of section 7456(c) of the Internal Revenue Code¹ and Rules 180 and 181, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.² The Court agrees with and adopts his opinion which is set forth*495 below.

¶3OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE

¶4DINAN, Special Trial Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income taxes for 1977 and 1978 in the amounts of $ 230.70 and $ 148.21, respectively, and imposed excise taxes for those years in the amounts of $ 42.00 and $ 84.00, respectively. The issues for decision are (1) whether $ 700 contributions to an individual retirement account in each of the years 1977 and 1978 were deductible under section 219, and (2) whether any portion of such contributions constituted excess contributions subject to the 6 percent excise tax imposed by section 4973.

¶5FINDINGS OF FACT

¶6Petitioners Michael J. Ryan and Ellen M. Ryan, husband and wife, lived in the town of Batavia, New York, at the time they filed their petition in this case. They filed joint Federal income tax returns*496 for 1977 and 1978. Mrs. Ryan will sometimes be referred to as the petitioner.

¶7During the years in issue, petitioner was a part-time employee of Saint Jerome's Hospital (the Hospital) in Batavia, New York. The Hospital qualified as a section 501(c)(3) organization and had a pension plan for employees who worked more than 1,000 hours per year. Petitioner was not eligible to participate in that pension plan because she worked less than the required 1,000 hours.

¶8On February 17, 1977, petitioner and the Hospital executed an "Amendment to Employment Contract and Authorization to Purchase Annuity Contract" (the agreement). Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, petitioner agreed to a $ 520.00 reduction in the amount of her annual salary and the Hospital agreed to pay $ 520.00 annually to the Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers) for the purchase of a nonforfeitable annuity contract to provide retirement benefits to petitioner. The annuity contract purchased by the Hospital from Travelers was a tax-sheltered annuity which satisfied the requirements of section 403(b).

¶9On or about August 1, 1977, petitioner established an individual retirement account (IRA) with Capital Guardian*497 Trust Company. In each of the years 1977 and 1978, petitioner paid $ 700.00 into the IRA and deducted those amounts on her Federal income tax returns for those years. In his notice of deficiency, the Commissioner disallowed the deductions and imposed excise taxes for the years 1977 and 1978 in the amounts of $ 42.00 and $ 84.00, respectively.

¶10OPINION

¶11The deductibility of contributions to an IRA is governed by section 219. Section 219(a) permits a taxpayer to deduct from gross income amounts paid in cash to an IRA. Section 219(b)(1) ³ limited the amount of the deduction allowed to the lesser of $ 1,500.00 or 15 percent of the individual's compensation includable in gross income for the taxable year. Section 219(b)(2)(B), in pertinent part, disallowed any deduction under section 219(a) for the taxable year if amounts were contributed by the taxpayer's employer for an annuity contract described in section 403(b) (whether or not his rights in such contract were nonforfeitable).

¶12*498 Petitioner argues that she is not precluded by section 219(b)(2)(B) from deducting the amounts paid to her IRA because her employer did not contribute any amounts for an annuity contract described in section 403(b). We disagree and find for the respondent.

¶13Generally, contributions to an annuity plan or other retirement fund paid by an employee or by his employer out of the employee's salary constitute gross income to the employee, Ward v. Commissioner,159 F.2d 502 (2d Cir. 1947), affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court, and are taxable in the year when made.

¶14Section 403(b), however, carves out an exception to the general rule and permits a taxpayer to defer payment of income taxes on amounts paid into an annuity plan until the annuity payments are made to the taxpayer.

¶15Section 403 provides, in pertinent part:

¶16(b) Taxability of Beneficiary Under Annuity Purchased by Section 501(c)(3) Organization or Public School.--

¶17(1) General Rule.--If--

¶18(A) an annuity contract is purchased--

¶19(i) for an employee by an employer described in section 501(c)(3) which is exempt from tax under section 501(a), or

¶20(C) [and] the employee's rights under the contract*499 are nonforfeitable, except for failure to pay future premiums,

¶21then amounts contributed by such employer for such annuity contract on or after such rights become nonforfeitable shall be excluded from the gross income of the employee for the taxable year to the extent that the aggregate of such amounts does not exceed the exclusion allowance for such taxable year.

¶22Section 1.403(b)-1(b)(3)(i), Income Tax Regs., provides, in pertinent part:

¶23[t]he exclusion provided by [section 403(b)] is applicable to amounts contributed by an employer for an annuity contract as a result of an agreement with an employee to take a reduction in salary, or to forego an increase in salary, but only to the extent such amounts are earned by the employee after the agreement becomes effective. Such an agreement must be legally binding and irrevocable with respect to amounts earned while the agreement is in effect. ⁴

¶24Section 403, and the regulations published pursuant to that section, make it clear that*500 in order for a taxpayer to defer the taxation of amounts contributed to an annuity plan, it must be the employer who contributes to the annuity plan for the employee's benefit. The requirement that the contributions to the plan be made by the employer is satisfied when the employer and the employee enter into a contract which provides that the employee will take a reduction in salary and that the employer will pay a like amount into an annuity plan for the employee's benefit. See Bollotin v. United States,38 AFTR 2d 76-5712, 76-2 USTC par. 9604 (S.D.N.Y. 1976), affd. by unpublished order (2d Cir. 1977).

¶25Petitioner implicitly acknowledges that, pursuant to section 403(b), amounts were paid by her employer to an annuity plan for her benefit, since she excluded such amounts from her gross income on her Federal income tax returns for the years in issue. This being so, the prohibitions of section 219(b)(2)(B) are directly applicable to this case and petitioner may not deduct those amounts paid by her to an IRA in 1977 and 1978.

¶26Petitioners have stipulated that, should the respondent prevail on the deductibility of the IRA payments in issue, they are liable for the*501 excise taxes imposed pursuant to section 4973.

¶27Decision will be entered for the respondent.