43 Tex. Crim. 219 - Ogle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Acts 2001, 77th Leg., H.J.R. 75, § 2.09, adopted Nov. 6, 2001. [17] For example, in Ogle v. State, 43 Tex.Crim. 219 , 63 S.W. 1009 (1901), we observed: With respect to petit juries it is well settled that it must consist of the exact number prescribed by the constitution. In Stell v. State, 14 Tex.App. 59 [(1883)], it is said: `The record must show that the jury was a legal one, and if it does not the error is a radical one, which will be considered on appeal, whether properly availed of in the court below, or not, because”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Trinidad v. State

2. ““We are of opinion the court was correct in sustaining the demurrer to that portion of the plea which sets up the time endured under the first proceeding as a credit against the verdict to be rendered in this case. All the authorities we have found bearing on this question are adverse to appellant’s contention. Partial payments do not apply to judgments imposing imprisonment, unless by the pardoning power in the commutation of time.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 76 Okla. Crim. 204 - Ex Parte Wilkerson

3. “petit juries in the District Court shall be composed of twelve”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Trinidad v. State