Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 Tex. Crim. 367 - Miller v. State

43 Tex. Crim. 367 - Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1950
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1950

4 state decisions

20190119101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the indictment had alleged that the testimony given before the grand jury was material to some issue, this general allegation might have been sufficient; In the absence of this character of allegation, then enough of the facts and circumstances of the matter inquired about by the grand jury should have been stated to manifest its materiality.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.