Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 UTAH 40 - Sweetser v. Fox

Sweetser v. Fox’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
8
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2007

6 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

601913192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gordon v. Gilfoil · McKannay v. Horton · Wright v. . Nostrand · Feeney v. Hinckley · Oneida County Bk. v. . Bonney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “cause of action on a judgment ... arises as soon as the judgment has a legal existence, which is immediately upon its rendition”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the statute of limitations is set in motion at that time”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.