43 Va. App. 219 - Hudgins v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blockburger v. United States · Burks v. United States · Ashe v. Swenson · Brown v. Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny possible distinction between an `element' of a felony offense and a `sentencing factor' was unknown to the practice of criminal indictment, trial by jury, and judgment by court . . . as it existed during the years surrounding our Nation's founding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Com. v. Hudgins“[a]ny person who . . . commits larceny from the person of another of money or other thing of value of $5 or more . . . shall be guilty of grand larceny.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Com. v. Hudgins“did steal property having a value of five dollars ($5) or more from the person of [Benjamin], in violation of Code § 18.2-95.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Com. v. Hudgins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.