Shreeder v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1980
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ricketson v. Richardson · Bensieck v. Cook · State ex rel. Ozark County v. Tate · Dawson v. Schloss · Davis v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But while the question seems never to have been discussed by this court, the uniform practice of the court since its organization has been to treat judgments against two or more persons for the purposes of an appeal as a several judgment rather than as an entirety.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cook v. Commellini
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.