Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 Wash. 2d 542 - Sweeny v. Sweeny

43 Wash. 2d 542 - Sweeny v. Sweeny’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
August 2004
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2004

15 state decisions

40195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Groves v. First Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Ormsby · State ex rel. Jones v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we are reluctant to disturb a custody disposition made by the trial court, and we will do so only upon a showing of manifest abuse of discretion by the trial court.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In assuming responsibility for the custody and care of children of divorced parents, the courts are entitled to expect a custodial parent to assume some responsibility and to act in a reliable manner in performing any responsibility imposed by the court as to the care of a child. In the instant case, Mrs. Sweeny’s conduct was not solely a matter of violating a court order or of disrespect for the court. That alone is a serious matter and might very well bear upon the determination of a parent’s fitness to discipline, instruct, and care for a child. Certainly, a lack of respect for the courts, for law and order, may quite conceivably set an example not conducive to good citizenship or to a well-adjusted character or personality on the part of a child.” 43 Wash.2d at 552 , 262 P.2d at 213 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.