Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 Wash. App. 217 - Krikava v. Webber

43 Wash. App. 217 - Krikava v. Webber’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2012

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

1101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 100 Wash. 2d 643 - Mellor v. Chamberlin · Answering Service, Inc. v. Egan · 17 Wash. 2d 47 - Maib v. Maryland Casualty Co. · 33 Wash. App. 685 - Marquardt v. Federal Old Line Insurance · Snyder v. Marken

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “) 13(a), provides: 79 Compulsory Counterclaims: A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim and does not require for its adjudication the presence of third parties of whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction. But the pleader need not state the claim if (1) at the time the action was commenced the claim was the subject of another pending action.... 80 CR 13(a); CRLJ 13(a). 9”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Cross Claim Against Coparty. A pleading may state as a cross claim any claim by one party against a coparty arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter either of the original action or of a counterclaim therein or relating to any property that is the subject matter of the original action. Such cross claim may include a claim that the party against whom it is asserted is or may be liable to the cross claimant for all or part of a claim asserted in the action against the cross claimant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If a party does not assert a compulsory counterclaim, that party is barred from asserting that claim as an independent claim or as a counterclaim in any other action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.