43 Wash. App. 223 - Bader v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably 116 Wash. 2d 596 - Babcock v. State (1991), 113 Wash. 2d 123 - Bruce v. Byrne-Stevens & Associates Engineers, Inc. (1989)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 103 Wash. 2d 768 - Hartley v. State · 100 Wash. 2d 421 - Petersen v. State · 97 Wash. 2d 929 - Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc. · 103 Wash. 2d 800 - Sea-Pac Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Local Union 44 · O'BARR v. Feist
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When psychiatrists or mental health providers are appointed by the court and render an advisory opinion to the court on a criminal defendant's mental condition, they are acting as an arm of the court and are protected from suit by absolute judicial immunity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The following actions shall be commenced within three years: (2) An action for taking, detaining, or injuring personal property, including an action for the specific recovery thereof, or for any other injury to the person or rights of another not hereinafter enumerated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was not admitted to the mental hospital because of any crime he had committed and no recommendation was made to the court for his release . . ..”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.