43 Wash. App. 340 - State v. Harp’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably 108 Wash. 2d 419 - State v. Fisher (1987), 115 Wash. 2d 445 - State v. Pryor (1990)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 42 Wash. App. 78 - State v. Wood · 36 Wash. App. 357 - Jones v. Robert E. Bayley Construction Co. · 42 Wash. App. 1 - State v. Stalker · 50 Wash. 2d 288 - Pacific Northwest Pipeline Corp. v. Myers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendants will be held accountable for those crimes of which they are convicted, but not for crimes the prosecutor could not, or chose not to, prove”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“inasmuch as we are unable to determine what the sentence would have been had the improper finding not been considered, we must remand to permit the sentencing judge to exercise his discretion upon only proper findings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“refer, among other factors, to the purposes of the act as stated in RCW 9.94A.010.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.