43 Wash. App. 397 - State v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2009
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 105 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Bergeron · 105 Wash. 2d 632 - State v. Terrovona · 100 Wash. 2d 607 - State v. Johnson · 98 Wash. 2d 30 - State v. Robtoy · 101 Wash. 2d 745 - State v. Laureano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]vidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is presumptively inadmissible to prove character and show action in conformity therewith. ER 404(b)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When the sole purpose of the other crimes evidence is to show ... propensity... there is no room for ad hoc balancing. The evidence is then unequivocally inadmissible....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cook
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.