Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 Wash. App. 705 - State v. Pestrin

43 Wash. App. 705 - State v. Pestrin’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1996
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 102 Wash. 2d 182 - State v. Hicks · 101 Wash. 2d 576 - State v. Shriner · 92 Wash. 2d 193 - State v. Cann · 98 Wash. 2d 53 - State v. Sherman · 13 Wash. App. 782 - State v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In any prosecution for theft, it shall be a sufficient defense that the property or service was appropriated openly and avowedly under a claim of title made in good faith, even though the claim be untenable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “openly and avowedly under a claim of title,” and the trial court properly declined to include the instruction. IV. Amendment of the information CrR 2.1(d) provides for amendment of an infor mation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in light of the fact the trial was actually held within the 30-day period provided by CrR 3.3(d)(6).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.