Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 43 Wash. App. 893 - State v. Brower

43 Wash. App. 893 - State v. Brower’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2020

14 state decisions

8019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Butler · Roberts v. Florida · 96 Wash. 2d 591 - State v. Tharp · 100 Wash. 2d 686 - State v. Ringer · 99 Wash. 2d 663 - State v. Valladares

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No person may, by any intentional act reasonably likely to provoke a belligerent response, create a necessity for acting in self[-] defense and thereupon use force upon another person. Therefore, if you find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was the aggressor, and that defendant's acts and conduct provoked or commenced the fight, then self-defense is not available as a defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If Mr. Brower was to be perceived as the aggressor, it was only in terms of the assault itself. Under the facts of this case, the aggressor instruction was improper. Upton , at 204. The inclusion of the instruction effectively deprived him of his theory of self-defense; the jury was left to speculate as to the lawfulness of this conduct prior to the assault. State v. Arthur, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The record before us does not show that Wingate was involved in any wrongful or unlawful conduct when he pointed his gun at Park in an attempt to keep Park from harming Koo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.