Prybolsky v. Prybolsky’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2003
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McGee v. International Life Insurance · 125 N.J. Super. 171 - Egbert v. Egbert · McCoy v. Hickman · 32 N.J. Super. 333 - Lea v. Lea · Rosemary K. v. Kevin Dc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[rlapid technological developments improving the speed and facility of transportation necessitate an expanded seope of jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The state of matrimonial domicile, which is the state where the spouses were domiciled when they last lived together as man and wife, should usually at least have jurisdiction to grant support if the plaintiff spouse has continuously remained domiciled there.” § 77 Comment C.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reimbursement for public funds, if any, expended for the welfare of [nonresident's] dependents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.