430 F.2d 1177 - United States v. King — 430 F.2d 1177

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2016

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1Rodney A. Klein (argued), of Fields & Klein, Sacramento, Cal., for appellant.

¶2Charles S. Fenning (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Phillip W. Johnson, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before MADDEN,* Judge, United States Court of Claims, DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge, and SWEIGERT,… District Judge.

¶6PER CURIAM:

¶7This is an appeal from the denial, by the District Court, of the defendant’s motion for an order permitting the defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty, and setting aside the judgment and sentence theretofore entered against him. The motion was made pursuant to Rule 32(d) and Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The District Court denied the motion and filed an opinion which appears in 307 F.Supp. at page 217. Our conclusion is that the District Court’s decision was right, for the reasons stated in the Court’s able opinion. We therefore affirm the denial of the defendant’s motion.

¶8Affirmed.