Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

430 F.2d 1183

Docket No. 23579.

Thurman v. United States

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1970-10-05

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1970

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Thurman v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1970-10-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Sherrill Halbert, Judge.

LeRue Grim (argued), San Francisco, Cal, for appellant.

James J. Simonelli (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., John P. Hyland, U.S. Atty., Sacramento, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The court considers that Thurman's appeal in the above case is moot by reason of our decision in Thurman v. United States, 423 F.2d 988.

¶2

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

/430/f2d/1183 · .json · Public domain