Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 F.2d 173 - United States v. Campos-Serrano

United States v. Campos-Serrano’s Empirical Analysis

430 F.2d 173 · 1970

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2011 · most notably United States v. Campos-Serrano (1971), Au Yi Lau, Yim Tsz Ki, Lam Sai Ting v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Tit Tit Wong and Nei Ngan Chan v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (1971)

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

16019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1546 · 8 U.S.C. § 1304 (§ 264 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1306 (§ 266 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schmerber v. State of California · Gilbert v. California · Boyd v. United States · Marchetti v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the initial inquiry to determine whether the defendant was properly in this country did not violate his fifth amendment privilege;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. YAU
  2. “An individual should not be compelled to produce the crime itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.