Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 F.2d 459 - Crail v. United States

Crail v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

430 F.2d 459 · 1970

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently April 2004 · most notably Walker v. Attorney General for Oklahoma (1999), United States v. Owens (1989)

33 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

2801970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Wellnitz v. Page · Larry G. Linebarger v. State of Oklahoma and Ray H. Page, Warden · Wolcott v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[H]as [the defendant] sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding — and [has he] a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him.” Dusky v. United States, 1960, 362 U.S. 402 , 80 S.Ct. 788 , 4 L.Ed.2d 824 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““does not necessarily result in an impairment of mental competency. Thus, while that fact must be considered, the issue is whether appellant, despite such concussion, had the capacities inherent in the Dusky test”;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.