Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 F.2d 781 - Guidry v. Texaco, Inc.

Guidry v. Texaco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

430 F.2d 781 · 1970

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
December 2004
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2004

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1501970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki · Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. · Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co. · Roberts v. Florida · Vaca v. Sipes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Only the issue of attorneys’ fees and expenses remains. Although the district court awarded Texaco indemnity from Gulf copper for all amounts it was required to pay Guidry, it declined to award attorneys’ fees and expenses. This we think was error. If Texaco was entitled to be indemnified by Gulf Copper, and we have held that it was, it was equally entitled to reimbursement for such reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses as it incurred in defending the claim asserted by Guidry in the trial and on this appeal. Lusich v. Bloomfield S. S. Co., 355 F.2d 770 (5th Cir. 1966).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 343 F. Supp. 826 - Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.
  2. “does not require remand where the omitted findings would not change the outcome of the [case].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Irby v. Sullivan

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.