Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 F.3d 1100 - United States v. Dowell

United States v. Dowell’s Empirical Analysis

430 F.3d 1100 · 2005

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2020

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

120200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2332B (§ 702 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3501 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 26 U.S.C. § 7212 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Booker · Blakely v. Washington · Jackson v. Denno · United States v. Young · Mincey v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless a serious factual dispute can be shown to exist, and one which, if successful, the defense would be entitled to exclusion, no hearing is at all necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.