United States v. Orenuga’s Empirical Analysis
430 F.3d 1158 · 2005
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2025
11 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments)
Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Old Chief v. United States · Sherman v. United States · Mathews v. United States · Morgan v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in the context of a bribe payor[,] . . . the offer of the bribe is the violation of the statute . . . [, and] the quid pro quo need not be 'fully executed for the act to be considered a bribe.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“includes the right to be tried by jurors who are capable of putting aside their personal impressions and opinions and rendering a verdict based solely on the evidence presented in court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he defense always must be given a full and fair opportunity to expose bias or prejudice on the part of the veniremen.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.