Ipxl Holdings Llc v. Amazoncom Inc’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
19 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross · Rubber Company v. Goodyear · Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Industries, Inc. · Amgen, Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Ben Venue Laboratories Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The system of claim 2 [including an input means] wherein the predicted transaction information comprises both a transaction type and transaction parameters associated with that transaction type, and the user uses the input means to either change the predicted transaction information or accept the displayed transaction type and transaction parameters.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t is unclear whether infringement of claim 25 occurs when one creates a system that allows the user to change the predicted transaction information or accept the displayed transaction, or whether infringement occurs when the user actually uses the input means to change transaction information or uses the input means to accept a displayed transaction. Because claim 25 recites both a system and the method for using that system, it does not apprise a person of ordinary skill in the art of its scope, and it is invalid under section 112, paragraph 2.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]s a result of the combination of two separate statutory classes of invention, a manufacturer or seller of the claimed apparatus would not know ... whether it might also be liable for contributory infringement because a buyer or user of the apparatus later performs the claimed method of using the apparatus.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.