Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 F.3d 546 - Monter v. Gonzales

Monter v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis

430 F.3d 546 · 2005

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
September 2017
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1451 (§ 340 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Kungys v. United States · Cardillo v. United States · Diallo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · American Petrofina Co. v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union Local No. 4-23

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “..The importance of the rights at issue leads us to conclude that the naturalized citizen should be able to refute that presumption, and avoid the consequence of denaturalization, by showing, through a preponderance of the evidence, that the statutory requirement as to which the misrepresentation had a natural tendency to produce, a favorable decision was in fact met.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “On March 1, 2003, the Immigration and Naturalization Service [INS] was reconstituted as the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the same uniform definition of `material' that is typically used in interpreting criminal statutes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.