Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 F.3d 567 - Stolt-Nielsen SA v. Celanese AG

Stolt-Nielsen SA v. Celanese AG’s Empirical Analysis

430 F.3d 567 · 2005

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Myers v. Hertz Corp. (2010), Britt v. Garcia (2006)

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

180200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · United States v. Nixon · Cobbledick v. United States · Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph · Swint v. Chambers County Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under traditional finality principles, a district court's decision to compel compliance with a subpoena or to deny a motion to quash a subpoena is generally not a `final decision' and therefore is not immediately appealable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “may summon in writing any person to attend before them or any of them as a witness and in a proper case to bring with him or them any book, record, document, or paper which may be deemed material as evidence in the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must defy the district court's enforcement order, be held in contempt, and then appeal the contempt order, which is regarded as final under § 1291.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.