Fongwo v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis
430 F.3d 944 · 2005
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty · Ngure v. Ashcroft · COELHO · Feleke v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · O-D
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must state new facts that are material to the outcome of the proceeding and were neither available nor discoverable at the prior hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Degbe v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.