United States v. Mays’s Empirical Analysis
430 F.3d 963 · 2005
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2021
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3556 · 18 U.S.C. § 3613 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 3202 · 28 U.S.C. § 3205
Relies on Catlin v. United States · Cannon v. University of Chicago · United States v. Satterfield · Lyndonville Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Lussier · Loeber v. Schroeder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he United States may enforce a judgment imposing [restitution] in accordance with the practices and procedures for the enforcement of a civil judgment under Federal law or State law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to obtain a civil judgment prior to enforcing a criminal restitution order,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Klein v. Comm'r
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.