Beebe v. Vaughn’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 1993
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 4 U.S.C. § 112
Relies on Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge Commission · State Dyer v. Sims · Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission v. Colburn · United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Esola, 53517 v. Ronald M. Groomes, Superintendent · League To Save Lake Tahoe v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Agreement provides a three step process by which both the interests of the inmate and the interests of the charging State may be furthered. First, the official who has custody of an inmate is required to inform the inmate of the existence of any detainer and of his or her rights under the IAD to request final disposition of the underlying charges. The inmate is then required to notify the custodian that he or she wishes a final disposition of the charges. The custodian then forwards the inmate’s request, along with a certificate stating the terms of the present commitment, the time remaining to be served, the amount of good time earned and information regarding parole eligibility of the inmate, to the State that has placed the detainer. With the receipt of that formal request, the charging state is put on notice that it has 180 days to bring the defendant to trial. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“notification to the court for a fast and speedy trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.