Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 F. Supp. 2d 1336 - In Re Managed Care Litigation

430 F. Supp. 2d 1336 - In Re Managed Care Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Antitrust cases are particularly instructive in the civil RICO context because, as the Supreme Court has observed, 'the civil action provision of RICO was patterned after the Clayton Act.' " In re Managed Care Litig. , 430 F.Supp.2d at 1345 (quoting Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Assocs., Inc. , 483 U.S. 143 , 150, 107 S.Ct. 2759 , 97 L.Ed.2d 121 (1987) ). The majority simply cannot ignore Matsushita as just "an antitrust case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate ... commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise's affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he universal applicability of the Supreme Court's analysis in Matsushita”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.