430 F. Supp. 2d 67 - Davis v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 28 U.S.C. § 2671 · 28 U.S.C. § 2674 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Heck v. Humphrey · United States v. Sherwood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“failed to allege that [the defendant] was personally involved in any of the investigations of the two ... incidents that led to [plaintiff's] arrest” and had”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.