Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 MASS 232 - In re Watt

In re Watt’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2025

7 state decisions

301999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of the Discipline of an Attorney · In re Schoepfer · In re Lebbos · In the Matter of McCabe · In the Matter of Carrigan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Deprivation arises when an attorney's intentional use of a client's funds results in the unavailability of the client's funds after they have become due, and may expose the client to a risk of harm, even if no harm actually occurs.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.