Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 MASS 359 - In re Segal

In re Segal’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Mullins v. Pine Manor College · Merisme v. Board of Appeals on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & Bonds · Arthurs v. Board of Registration in Medicine · Cousineau v. Laramee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While we review the entire record and consider whatever detracts from the weight of the board's conclusion, as long as there is substantial evidence, we do not disturb the board's finding, even if we would have come to a different conclusion if considering the matter do novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'Substantial evidence' means such evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.