Crenshaw v. Macklin’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably Iamele v. Asselin (2005), MacDonald v. Caruso (2014)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Long v. George · Harvard Law School Coalition for Civil Rights v. President & Fellows of Harvard College · Peterson v. Cadogan · O'Brien v. Director of the Division of Employment Security · Champagne v. Champagne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[A judge] shall determine whether or not to extend the order for any additional time reasonably necessary to protect the plaintiff or to enter a permanent order."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“empowers a judge in the District Court (or any other court with jurisdiction to consider the matter) to issue a permanent protective order at a renewal hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]ny relief granted by the court shall be for a fixed period of time not to exceed one year.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.