Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 MASS 710 - Commonwealth v. Donahue

Commonwealth v. Donahue’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

2 district · 77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Mole v. University of Massachusetts (2004), Commonwealth v. Crayton (2014)

2 district · 77 state decisions

450200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Ventresca · Dwyer v. Globe Newspaper Co. · Figueroa v. United States · Teamsters Local Union 657 v. Rodriguez · Commonwealth v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “provide[s] a substantial basis for concluding that evidence connected to the crime will be found on the specified premises”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]n affidavit must contain enough information for an issuing magistrate to determine that the items sought are related to the criminal activity under investigation, and that they reasonably may be expected to be located in the place to be searched at the time the search warrant issues.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We generally 'presume that a jury understand and follow limiting instructions, ... and that the application of such instructions ordinarily renders any potentially prejudicial evidence harmless.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.