430 N.J. Super. 121 - Washington v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Frost · State v. Clawans · 91 N.J. Super. 410 - Wild v. Roman · Bender v. Adelson · 234 N.J. Super. 375 - Genovese v. NJ Tr. Rail Operations
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whom the plaintiff/defendant would naturally be expected to produce;” (2) whether “there has been a satisfactory explanation for [the witness's] non-production;” (3) whether the witness "is equally available to both parties;” and (4) whether the witness’s "testimony would be comparatively unimportant, cumulative in nature or inferi- or to that which you already have before you.” In contrast to Model Jury Charge (Criminal), "Witness — Failure of the Defendant to Produce”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.