State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2017
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kentucky v. Stincer · United States v. Gagnon · Lakeside v. Oregon · State v. Cermak · State v. Rosen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[1]f defendant or his attorney had asserted defendant’s right to be present in this case, it would have been error for the trial court to deny defendant that right and we would have to determine whether or not the error was prejudicial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Since the defendant’s attorney did not request that defendant be allowed to be present or object to defendant’s absence, the court of appeals should have simply held that the issue was forfeited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bashire
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.