State v. Sorenson’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Cortez · Delaware v. Prouse · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The right of the people to be secure in their ■persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the person or things to be seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Sorenson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.