Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 P.3d 11 - State v. Haygood

State v. Haygood’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

31 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · State v. Ward · State v. Gunby · State v. Plummer · State v. Pabst

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The first is subjective and requires a showing that [the defendant] sincerely and honestly believed it was necessary to kill to defend herself or others. The second prong is an objective standard and requires a showing that a reasonable person in [the defendant's] circumstances would have perceived the use of deadly force in self-defense as necessary.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(c) Nothing in this section shall require a person to retreat if such person is using force to protect such person or a third person.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “' "this fact has some real bearing on the decision in the case,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.