Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 P.3d 902 - In re Crandall

In re Crandall’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Dennis · In re Lober · State v. Godfrey · State v. Gomez · State v. Cooperwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “210. Aggravating circumstances are any considerations or factors that may justify an increase in the degree of discipline to be imposed. In reaching its recommendation for discipline, the hearing panel, in this case, found the following aggravating factors present.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to comply with Rule 6.02(a)(5)'s requirement that he explain why [the court] should consider his constitutional arguments when they are raised for the first time in his brief in this court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[M]isconduct in another jurisdiction 'still reflects on the ability of that lawyer to practice' in the licensing jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.