Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 430 P3D 946 - State v. Regelman

State v. Regelman’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Charles McArthur · United States v. Kim · State v. Ramirez · State v. Fisher · State v. Sanchez-Loredo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the Fifth Amendment, statements stemming from custodial interrogation must be excluded unless the State demonstrates it used procedural safeguards, i.e., Miranda warnings, to secure the defendant's privilege against self-incrimination. 'The Miranda safeguards are triggered only when an accused is (1) in custody and (2) subject to interrogation.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'an appellate court reviews the factual underpinnings of the decision under a substantial competent evidence standard. The ultimate legal conclusion drawn from those facts is reviewed de novo. . . . Substantial evidence refers to evidence that a reasonable person could accept as being adequate to support a conclusion. . . . This court does not reweigh the evidence, assess the credibility of the witnesses, or resolve evidentiary conflicts. [Citations omitted.]' State v. Mattox, 305 Kan. 1015 , 1035, 390 P.3d 514 (2017).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'Probable cause is the reasonable belief that a specific crime has been committed and that the defendant committed the crime. Probable cause exists where the facts and circumstances within the arresting officers' knowledge and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient in themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that an offense has been or is being committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.